Whether you’re a current or former SJP client, understanding these issues can help you protect your financial interests and make informed decisions.
Overcharging for Advice Fees
SJP has set aside a substantial £426 million for potential refunds to clients who may have paid for advice they didn’t receive between 2018 and 2023. If you’ve paid for “all-inclusive” fees but haven’t received advice in the past 18 months, you might be eligible for compensation. It’s worth reviewing your records for the past five years to check if you received regular advice as promised. If you suspect overcharging, consider contacting SJP directly or seeking independent financial advice.
Interested in finding out if you can claim?
Use our claims calculator to get an idea what you’re potential owed
Mis-selling of Financial Products
Some clients may have grounds for claims if they received unsuitable advice that led to investment losses. This could include being advised to transfer pensions or make investments that were not appropriate for their circumstances or risk profile. If you believe your investments don’t match your risk profile or financial goals, it’s advisable to gather documentation of the advice you received and the subsequent investment performance. Consider seeking a second opinion from an independent financial advisor to assess the suitability of your investments.
Poor Fund Performance
Claims may be possible for funds that have consistently underperformed compared to similar funds in the market. If you’re concerned about your fund’s performance, compare it to relevant market benchmarks over several years. Consider how this performance has impacted your overall investment goals. Consistent underperformance could be grounds for further investigation.
Lack of Transparency About Fees and Charges
Some clients may have grounds for claims if they were not properly informed about the full extent of fees and charges associated with their investments. Review all documentation provided by SJP and compare the actual charges to what was initially disclosed. If you find discrepancies, request a full breakdown of all fees and charges applied to your investments.
Exit Penalties
Clients who faced high exit fees when trying to move their investments elsewhere may have grounds for compensation. Review the terms of your investment agreement and compare SJP’s exit fees to industry standards. Consider whether these fees were clearly explained when you first invested.
Failure to Provide Ongoing Services
If you’ve paid for ongoing advice or annual reviews that were not provided, you may be eligible for compensation. Check your agreement for promised ongoing services and review records of actual services received. Keep a log of attempts to contact your advisor for scheduled reviews, as this could be valuable evidence if you decide to pursue a claim.
Misrepresentation of Investment Risks
Claims could be made if the risks associated with investments were not adequately explained or were misrepresented. Review your initial investment discussions and documentation. Assess whether the actual risk aligns with what was presented to you. If you’re unsure, consider seeking an independent risk assessment of your portfolio.
Tied Agency Issues
Some clients may have grounds for complaints if they were misled about the nature of SJP’s tied agency status, believing they were receiving independent advice when SJP advisers can only recommend SJP products. Review your initial discussions and documentation about your advisor’s status. Consider whether you were aware of these limitations and how they might have impacted the suitability of advice for your needs.
Inappropriate Pension Transfers
Particular concern surrounds cases involving transfers out of defined benefit (final salary) pension schemes that may not have been in the client’s best interests. If you were advised to transfer out of such a scheme, review the advice given and assess whether the transfer was truly beneficial for you. Consider seeking an independent review of your pension situation.
While these potential claims highlight areas of concern, it’s crucial to remember that each case is unique. If you believe you may have grounds for a claim against St. James’s Place, gather all relevant documentation and seek professional advice. Consider contacting SJP directly to discuss your concerns or consult with an independent financial advisor or legal professional specializing in financial services claims.
The goal is not just potential compensation, but ensuring your investments align with your financial goals and risk tolerance. Stay informed, ask questions, and don’t hesitate to seek clarity on any aspect of your financial arrangements. Remember, protecting your financial future is paramount, and understanding your rights as an investor is a crucial step in that process.